PM sorting

Site Feedback
#1

Been looking at my PM’s they are listed chronologically from the earliest to the latest , is there a setting im missing so I can change it so they are descending

Craig :smile:

1 Like
#2

That’s a bug dude - probably from the performance code change that was included just a few hours ago.

I’ll report it up stream.

Thanks!

1 Like
#3

Turn your screen upside down mate.

Steve

4 Likes
#4

Thanks @DeanMarkTaylor you sir are a legend

@stevie you sir are a ■■■■ … funny though :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:

Craig :smile:

1 Like
#5

Sorry buddy, but as @DeanMarkTaylor said we looked into it and the performance code has a bug, throwing the error code 67243/1277. It’s not letting the vertical aligned numerical feature to act. I am on with this and should have it rectified soon as.

Steve

1 Like
#6

Lies all lies!!! :slight_smile: lol

1 Like
#7

Well its good to see the coding has moved on transgenetically from the last data line protocol fault we had , that was misaligned beta code on the 5357/0876 input data line

Craig :smile:

1 Like
#8

Glad to see you aint forgotten what I taught you @CDMH :smile:
Steve

1 Like
#9

The 3 B’s have always worked a treat

Craig :wink:

2 Likes
#10

#Hacking intensifies

2 Likes
#11

I know why it’s ■■■■■■ the poxy thing starts 6 72 The performance bug was written by Mitsubishi its the 6G72 bug

3 Likes
#12

This PM sorting issue (otherwise known as 67243/1277) has been fixed.

Could you confirm @CDMH?

Cheers,
Dean.

2 Likes
#13

Yep all good now @DeanMarkTaylor :sunglasses:

Cheers

Craig :smile:

1 Like
#14

Awesome Sauce

Thanks for confirming @CDMH!

1 Like
#17

This topic was automatically closed 2 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.